Sample documents
CC4r
Our thinking about reuse came to focus during the collective process of rewriting the Free Art License into Collective Conditions for Reuse. In the mean time we gathered many ideas for reformulating CC4r, but for the time being we think it remains a thought provoking and stimulating document.
https://constantvzw.org/wefts/cc4r.en.html
Licence: CC4r
The Nonviolent Public Licence v7
This licence is part of a group of ‘ethical licences’ that have appeared since 2018. Together with projects such as the Do No Harm Licence, the Hippocratic Licence or the Anti-996 Licence, such ethical licences experiment with Open Content licensing as a tool to control who can or cannot reuse content that Open Source communities produce, and for what purpose. The Nonviolent Public Licence is one of the more verbose projects of the group and included here because it is meant to cover all kinds of content, including cultural production.
https://thufie.lain.haus/NPL.html
Licence: Custom. "Copyright (c) 2019-2021 Thufie. You may do as you please with this license, copy, modify, and redistribute it. The only restriction is that you change the name of the resultant work if modifications were made including changing the Uniform Resource Identifier of the work."
Copy far AI license
This is an interesting proposal because it functions more as an add-on than a complete license and addresses the problems with reuse in Artificial Intelligence applications. It was created to supply the absence of specific licenses that restricts ingestion of content by LLMs and image classifiers. It can be plugged into any existing license.
https://copyfarai.itcouldbewor.se/
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Self-Review of Citational Practice
Self-Review of Citational Practice was formulated by Angela Okune in 2019 as a short list of questions that she suggests to ask ourselves, before publishing a text or other work. It is clearly situated in scholarly practice, but invites reflection and consideration of reuse in other practices as well.
License: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA)
Cite as: Angela Okune, "Okune, Angela. (2019, May 21). Self-Review of Citational Practice. Zenodo.", contributed by Angela Okune, Research Data Share, Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography, last modified 8 October 2020, accessed 21 August 2024. https://www.researchdatashare.org/content/okune-angela-2019-may-21-self-review-citational-practice-zenodo
rewritten Okune questions (need to find back pad)
The Self-Review of Citational Practice was one of the ingredients of an on-line reading session organised as part of Ecologies of dissemination. Participants decided to rephrase some of its questions to reflect their different approach to reuse.
[NEED TO FIND BACK PAD]
Licence: undefined
Community research contracts
what are they, why are they here
Licence:
CUTE
CUTE, "Conditions d'utilisations typographiques engageantes" (engaging typographic conditions for use) were developed between 2022 and 2024 by Bye Bye Binary. The Franco-Belgian collective is invested in proliferating a specific post-binary typographic practice. The CUTE stipulates under which conditions the fonts can be used and modified and brings up two important issues. These conditions ask users and re-users to take into account their own economic situation and financially support the typographic practice of those that release the fonts.
https://cryptpad.fr/pad/#/3/pad/edit/785c5d053f7a19c0421cbed63858a1fc/
Licence: CC4r
Protocol for respectful guests
One example that serves as inspiring case for setting the conditions for reuse is As I Remember It Teachings (Ɂəms tɑɁɑw) from the Life of a Sliammon Elder (2018), an open access digital publication sharing the teachings of the Sliammon (ɬaʔamɩn) elder and knowledge keeper Elsie Paul.
The interactive multi-media online publication, a non-linear account of Sliammon knowledge and teachings opens with a pop-up notice ‘Protocol for Being a Respectful Guest’. After a short introduction, the readers get notified that they enter a webspace which operates according to an indigenous protocol that stipulates the conditions under which the website and its contents can be accessed and used. It lays out the procedure and mutual obligations, similar to a code of conduct. Interestingly, the notice states that the materials shared on the website are not simply ‘content or information, rather they are our belongings, the intellectual property of myself or the ɬaʔamɩn people’.
Even if the ‘Protocol for Being a Respectful Guest’ touches upon intellectual property, the ɬaʔamɩn consider content, such as the shared knowledges and teachings, to belong rather than to be owned. The use of the term belonging shifts agency away from the makers of the stories (photos, videos, and language on the website) to the content itself. By making this shift, guests can be invited to develop a relation and sense of belonging to the shared knowledges.
Code of conduct type
Tentative:
[File:SEPT 2023 Code of Co-living HyperWerk IXDM DE.pdf]
Licence:
Collaboration agreement
The Brussels' design caravan OSP developed this Collaboration Agreement as a way to open a discussion about collective work, shared authorship and collaborative methods before the start of a process. We included this document because it situates practices of reuse in a larger ecology of practices. License: CC4r.
https://collaboration.osp.kitchen/
Licence: CC4r
