Reuse Case: Teaching Assignments: Difference between revisions

From Reuse
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "<onlyinclude><p style="background-color:#FFFF33;font-family:'Georgia'; font-size:24px;line-height:32px; padding: 2em; "> Art students in a seminar are tasked to develop assignments for teaching in the arts. One of the students ask whether it was okay to (re)use assignments from others discussed in the seminar in their own teaching. The group of students decided it was okay and agreed subsequently on setting up an open source pool to support each other by not having to re...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
<onlyinclude><p style="background-color:#FFFF33;font-family:'Georgia'; font-size:24px;line-height:32px; padding: 2em; ">
<onlyinclude><p style="background-color:#FFFF33;font-family:'Georgia'; font-size:24px;line-height:32px; padding: 2em; ">
Art students in a seminar are tasked to develop assignments for teaching in the arts. One of the students ask whether it was okay to (re)use assignments from others discussed in the seminar in their own teaching. The group of students decided it was okay and agreed subsequently on setting up an open source pool to support each other by not having to reinvent the wheel. Pitching this plan to another student group, the authorial status and ownership of teaching assignments has been discussed and asserted, with the rationale that individuals have put labour into developing the teaching assignments. Do I lose something by sharing my teaching ideas, or do I support others and get supported in return?
Art students in a seminar are tasked to develop assignments for teaching in the arts. One student asks whether it was okay to (re)use assignments from other students in their own teaching. The seminar group decides it was okay and agreed subsequently on setting up an open source pool to share and support each other by not having to reinvent the wheel. Pitching this plan to another student group, the authorial status and ownership of teaching assignments is being discussed and asserted, with the rationale that individuals have put labour into developing the teaching assignments. Do I lose something by sharing my teaching ideas, or do I support others and get supported in return?


[[Category: Cases]]
[[Category: Cases]]

Revision as of 11:44, 30 April 2024

Art students in a seminar are tasked to develop assignments for teaching in the arts. One student asks whether it was okay to (re)use assignments from other students in their own teaching. The seminar group decides it was okay and agreed subsequently on setting up an open source pool to share and support each other by not having to reinvent the wheel. Pitching this plan to another student group, the authorial status and ownership of teaching assignments is being discussed and asserted, with the rationale that individuals have put labour into developing the teaching assignments. Do I lose something by sharing my teaching ideas, or do I support others and get supported in return?