Sample documents: Difference between revisions
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
=== Protocol for respectful guests === | === Protocol for respectful guests === | ||
[[File:Protocol for being a respectful guest Elsie Paul.jpg]] | [[File:Protocol for being a respectful guest Elsie Paul.jpg|800px]] | ||
=== Code of conduct type === | === Code of conduct type === | ||
Revision as of 13:42, 24 October 2024
CC4r
Our thinking about reuse came to focus during the collective process of rewriting the Free Art License into Collective Conditions for Reuse. In the mean time we gathered many ideas for reformulating CC4r, but for the time being we think it remains a thought provoking and stimulating document.
https://constantvzw.org/wefts/cc4r.en.html
Licence: CC4r
The Nonviolent Public Licence v7
This licence is part of a group of ‘ethical licences’ that have appeared since 2018. Together with projects such as the Do No Harm Licence, the Hippocratic Licence or the Anti-996 Licence, such ethical licences experiment with Open Content licensing as a tool to control who can or cannot reuse content that Open Source communities produce, and for what purpose. The Nonviolent Public Licence is one of the more verbose projects of the group and included here because it is meant to cover all kinds of content, including cultural production.
https://thufie.lain.haus/NPL.html
Licence: Custom. "Copyright (c) 2019-2021 Thufie. You may do as you please with this license, copy, modify, and redistribute it. The only restriction is that you change the name of the resultant work if modifications were made including changing the Uniform Resource Identifier of the work."
Copy far AI license
This is an interesting proposal because it functions more as an add-on than a complete license and addresses the problems with reuse in Artificial Intelligence applications. It was created to supply the absence of specific licenses that restricts ingestion of content by LLMs and image classifiers. It can be plugged into any existing license.
https://copyfarai.itcouldbewor.se/
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Self-Review of Citational Practice
Self-Review of Citational Practice was formulated by Angela Okune in 2019 as a short list of questions that she suggests to ask ourselves, before publishing a text or other work. It is clearly situated in scholarly practice, but invites reflection and consideration of reuse in other practices as well.
License: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA)
Cite as: Angela Okune, "Okune, Angela. (2019, May 21). Self-Review of Citational Practice. Zenodo.", contributed by Angela Okune, Research Data Share, Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography, last modified 8 October 2020, accessed 21 August 2024. https://www.researchdatashare.org/content/okune-angela-2019-may-21-self-review-citational-practice-zenodo
rewritten Okune questions (need to find back pad)
The Self-Review of Citational Practice was one of the ingredients of an on-line reading session organised as part of Ecologies of dissemination. Participants decided to rephrase some of its questions to reflect their different approach to reuse.
[NEED TO FIND BACK PAD]
Licence: undefined
Community research contracts
what are they, why are they here
Licence:
CUTE
CUTE, "Conditions d'utilisations typographiques engageantes" (engaging typographic conditions for use) were developed between 2022 and 2024 by Bye Bye Binary. The Franco-Belgian collective is invested in proliferating a specific post-binary typographic practice. The CUTE stipulates under which conditions the fonts can be used and modified and brings up two important issues. These conditions ask users and re-users to take into account their own economic situation and financially support the typographic practice of those that release the fonts.
https://cryptpad.fr/pad/#/3/pad/edit/785c5d053f7a19c0421cbed63858a1fc/
Licence: CC4r
Protocol for respectful guests
Code of conduct type
which one ... something from Kritilab?!
Licence:
Collaboration agreement
The Brussels' design caravan OSP developed this Collaboration Agreement as a way to open a discussion about collective work, shared authorship and collaborative methods before the start of a process. We included this document because it situates practices of reuse in a larger ecology of practices. License: CC4r.
https://collaboration.osp.kitchen/
Licence: CC4r
