PARSE: Difference between revisions

From Reuse
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 30: Line 30:
== P-Reuse Cases ==
== P-Reuse Cases ==


=== Intro: P-Reuse Cases ===
=== Intro: Reuse Cases ===
The cases narrate moments where conflicts or dissensus arises around sharing and reuse in collective practice. We have drawn them from our own experiences and contexts, some were told to us by friends and colleagues, and others we have retold from public accounts.
The cases narrate moments where conflicts or dissensus arises around sharing and reuse in collective practice. We have drawn them from our own experiences and contexts, some were told to us by friends and colleagues, and others we have retold from public accounts.



Revision as of 17:17, 26 July 2024

P-Reuse Prompts

Intro reuse prompts

In progress

  1. P-Prompt: Prepositions
  2. P-Prompt: Do first times exist?
  3. P-Prompt: Collective agreements
  4. P-Prompt: Rebeing
  5. P-Prompt: Fortune teller
  6. P-Prompt: re:re:re:er:ri mixtape
  7. P-Prompt: Certifying bricks
  8. P-Prompt: Intimacy vs Property
  9. P-Prompt: It's not a thing
  10. P-Prompt: Real life examples
  11. P-Prompt: Spaces for discomfort - Honesty
  12. P-Prompt: Spaces for discomfort - Who will be paying the price?
  13. P-Prompt: Spaces for discomfort - Recognition
  14. P-Prompt: Never yours to begin with
  15. P-Prompt: What could/should a license enable ​​​​​​or support?

To be done

Prompt 10: This Is Not A Prompt
Prompt 19: Space for discomfort
P-Prompt: Gabriela

P-Reuse Cases

Intro: Reuse Cases

The cases narrate moments where conflicts or dissensus arises around sharing and reuse in collective practice. We have drawn them from our own experiences and contexts, some were told to us by friends and colleagues, and others we have retold from public accounts.

We invite you to use these cases to bring some nuance to the often polarised extremes of “universal entitlement” (permission to appropriate freely) and “universal restrictiveness” (cultural appropriation is impermissible), a binary that gets problematised by Thi C. Nguyen, who also contributed five cases from his own context in the US.

We wrote the cases as short vignettes omitting names, institutions or places on purpose. Their specificity is without detail to allow them to trigger actions, reflections and changes of perspective in different contexts. As a collection, they function as a toolbox filled with newly combinable building blocks that can contribute to the construction of more complex accounts of reuse.

These collected and curated accounts of lived situations went through an iterative process of telling, re-telling, editing and re-editing, so it would be counterintuitive to sign them as authors, though we to take responsibility for them as narrators.


Reuse Case: Cultural Appropriation
Reuse Case: Conceptual Poetry
Reuse Case: Entangled Authorship
Reuse Case: Non-Promiscuous Sharing
Reuse Case: Unsolicited Collaboration
Reuse Case: Declining Responsibility
Reuse Case: Wearing au dai
Reuse Case: Kimono runway
Reuse Case: Whose authority
Reuse Case: Shallow appropriation
Reuse Case: Balancing concerns
Reuse Case: Folktales
Reuse Case: Teaching Assignments
Reuse Case: Restitution

Draft Conversation Transcripts

Conversation with Séverine Dusollier
Conversation with Jennifer Hayashida

Readings, Podcasts, References

Readings, Podcasts, References

Questions (no answers)

Questions (no answers)

Glossary

Glossary

Practice Documents Examples

Sample documents

Biographies

Biographies