Prompts working page: title testing: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "<b>Prompt #5 ... fosters individuating processes<b/> Prompt #05 takes on Gary Hall's remark that similar to Creative Commons, the CC4r might put too much agency with sovereign individual (human) users. He argues that Creative Commons foster individuating processes rather than advocating for collective agreements. They are not contributing to social processes of production, management and maintenance. How could the CC4r be contributing to social processes? Could col...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<b>Prompt #5 ... fosters individuating processes<b | <b>Prompt #5 ... fosters individuating processes</b> | ||
Prompt #05 takes on Gary Hall's remark that similar to Creative Commons, the CC4r might put too much agency with sovereign individual (human) users. He argues that Creative Commons foster individuating processes rather than advocating for collective agreements. They are not contributing to social processes of production, management and maintenance. | Prompt #05 takes on Gary Hall's remark that similar to Creative Commons, the CC4r might put too much agency with sovereign individual (human) users. He argues that Creative Commons foster individuating processes rather than advocating for collective agreements. They are not contributing to social processes of production, management and maintenance. | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Prompt #06 ... difficult to gauge | <b>Prompt #06 ... difficult to gauge</b> | ||
In prompt #06 Gary Hall asks: " | </br> | ||
<i>(W)hat if (...) a future author is convinced that what they are doing is perfectly acceptable, and does not contribute to oppressive arrangements of power, privilege and difference, even though for a lot of others it does?</i> | In prompt #06 Gary Hall asks: "<i>(W)hat if (...) a future author is convinced that what they are doing is perfectly acceptable, and does not contribute to oppressive arrangements of power, privilege and difference, even though for a lot of others it does?</i> | ||
Source: https://copim.pubpub.org/pub/combinatorial-books-documentation-copyright-licences-post6/release/1 | Source: https://copim.pubpub.org/pub/combinatorial-books-documentation-copyright-licences-post6/release/1 | ||
Revision as of 18:05, 5 April 2024
Prompt #5 ... fosters individuating processes
Prompt #05 takes on Gary Hall's remark that similar to Creative Commons, the CC4r might put too much agency with sovereign individual (human) users. He argues that Creative Commons foster individuating processes rather than advocating for collective agreements. They are not contributing to social processes of production, management and maintenance.
How could the CC4r be contributing to social processes? Could collective conditions for re-use be thought of as relational, instead of counting on individual responsibility?
Source: https://copim.pubpub.org/pub/combinatorial-books-documentation-copyright-licences-post6/release/1
Prompt #06 ... difficult to gauge
In prompt #06 Gary Hall asks: "(W)hat if (...) a future author is convinced that what they are doing is perfectly acceptable, and does not contribute to oppressive arrangements of power, privilege and difference, even though for a lot of others it does?
Source: https://copim.pubpub.org/pub/combinatorial-books-documentation-copyright-licences-post6/release/1
