Reuse Case: Teaching Assignments: Difference between revisions
From Reuse
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "<onlyinclude><p style="background-color:#FFFF33;font-family:'Georgia'; font-size:24px;line-height:32px; padding: 2em; "> Art students in a seminar are tasked to develop assignments for teaching in the arts. One of the students ask whether it was okay to (re)use assignments from others discussed in the seminar in their own teaching. The group of students decided it was okay and agreed subsequently on setting up an open source pool to support each other by not having to re...") |
No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<onlyinclude><p style="background-color: | <onlyinclude><p style="background-color:Tomato;font-family:'Georgia'; font-size:24px;line-height:32px; padding: 2em; "> | ||
Art students in a seminar are tasked to develop assignments for teaching in the arts. One | Art students in a seminar are tasked to develop assignments for teaching in the arts. One student asks whether it was okay to (re)use assignments from other students in their own teaching. The seminar group decides it was okay and agreed subsequently on setting up an open source pool to share and support each other by not having to reinvent the wheel. Pitching this plan to another student group, the authorial status and ownership of teaching assignments is being discussed and asserted, with the rationale that individuals have put labour into developing the teaching assignments. Does anyone lose when sharing their teaching ideas, or is it a way to support others and get supported in return? | ||
[[Category: Cases]] | [[Category: Cases]] | ||
Latest revision as of 12:24, 30 April 2024
Art students in a seminar are tasked to develop assignments for teaching in the arts. One student asks whether it was okay to (re)use assignments from other students in their own teaching. The seminar group decides it was okay and agreed subsequently on setting up an open source pool to share and support each other by not having to reinvent the wheel. Pitching this plan to another student group, the authorial status and ownership of teaching assignments is being discussed and asserted, with the rationale that individuals have put labour into developing the teaching assignments. Does anyone lose when sharing their teaching ideas, or is it a way to support others and get supported in return?
