Reuse Case: Non-Promiscuous Sharing

From Reuse
Revision as of 16:46, 2 April 2024 by Eva (talk | contribs) (Created page with "<p style="background-color: #ccff66;font-family:'Georgia'; font-size:24px;line-height:32px; padding: 2em; "> Reuse Case: Non-Promiscuous Sharing <br/> <br/> The Labriola National American Indian Data Center describes itself as an “Indigenous library center led by an all-Indigenous staff”. On their website, under the header “Information is Sacred…” they mention how as part of their work, the center develops protocols for cultural and Tribal sovereignty, aiming...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Reuse Case: Non-Promiscuous Sharing

The Labriola National American Indian Data Center describes itself as an “Indigenous library center led by an all-Indigenous staff”. On their website, under the header “Information is Sacred…” they mention how as part of their work, the center develops protocols for cultural and Tribal sovereignty, aiming for Indigenous ownership of knowledge. The conditions for re-use of the library's material are being articulated by librarians or custodians, rather than by their authors. To signal these conditions, librarians put orange tags in books which they consider containing misrepresentations of Indigenous peoples, and blue tags in those which include knowledge that shouldn’t be shared “promiscuously”. There is no information on the website about what “non-promiscuous sharing” would entail.