Prompt 04: Collective agreements: Difference between revisions
From Reuse
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<div class="material"> | <div class="material"> | ||
[[File:Prompt4 Gary Hall Experimenting with CC.png|thumb|left|500px]] | [[File:Prompt4 Gary Hall Experimenting with CC.png|thumb|left|500px]] | ||
[[File:Prompt Gary Hall Experimenting with Copyright Licences.png|700px]] | |||
<br clear=all> | <br clear=all> | ||
Source: Gary Hall, Experimenting with Copyright Licences (Apr 20, 2023) https://copim.pubpub.org/pub/combinatorial-books-documentation-copyright-licences-post6/release/1 | Source: Gary Hall, Experimenting with Copyright Licences (Apr 20, 2023) https://copim.pubpub.org/pub/combinatorial-books-documentation-copyright-licences-post6/release/1 | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
[[Category: Prompts]] | [[Category: Prompts]] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:14, 15 July 2024
Prompt 04 takes on Gary Hall's remark that, similar to Creative Commons, the CC4r might put too much agency with sovereign individual (human) users. He argues that Creative Commons foster individuating processes rather than advocating for collective agreements. They are not contributing to social processes of production, management, and maintenance.
How could the CC4r be contributing to social processes? Could collective conditions for re-use be thought of as relational, instead of counting on individual responsibility?
Source: Gary Hall, Experimenting with Copyright Licences (Apr 20, 2023) https://copim.pubpub.org/pub/combinatorial-books-documentation-copyright-licences-post6/release/1
