Prompt 14: Prepositions: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (16 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Séverine Dusollier''' sent us three prompts after we met for an afternoon to record a conversation (We might turn the conversation into a podcast. You'll find the transcript [[Conversation_with_Séverine_Dusollier|here]]). Séverine has been a long time close collaborator and inspiration to us. As a lawyer developing critical approaches to copyright and IP, she brings a particular perspective. | |||
Séverine | |||
In her first prompt, she proposes to reconsider the relationship between copyright and collective practice asking whether a move from the singular to plural would be sufficient. | In her first prompt, she proposes to reconsider the relationship between copyright and collective practice asking whether a move from the singular to plural would be sufficient. | ||
<div class="material"> | |||
<blockquote>"REMINDER TO CURRENT AND FUTURE AUTHORS: The authored work released under the CC4r was never yours to begin with. The CC4r considers authorship to be part of a collective cultural effort and rejects authorship as ownership derived from individual genius. This means to recognize that it is situated in social and historical conditions and that there may be reasons to refrain from release and re-use." (Collective Condition for Reuse)</blockquote> | <blockquote>"REMINDER TO CURRENT AND FUTURE AUTHORS: The authored work released under the CC4r was never yours to begin with. The CC4r considers authorship to be part of a collective cultural effort and rejects authorship as ownership derived from individual genius. This means to recognize that it is situated in social and historical conditions and that there may be reasons to refrain from release and re-use." (Collective Condition for Reuse)</blockquote> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="prompt"> | <div class="prompt"> | ||
If copyright can be said to convey the following | If copyright can be said to convey the following: | ||
What could CC4r convey? Is it sufficient to change mine to ours, me to us? < | * This work '''is mine''': copyright as ownership, as property right | ||
* This work '''is me''': copyright as personality right | |||
* This work '''is by me''': copyright as a derivation from individual genius, moral right of attribution/paternity<br/> | |||
* This work '''is from me''': attribution of a work to me / originality conceived as an author’s own creation<br/> | |||
* This work '''is to me''': exclusive rights granted by copyright | |||
* This work '''...''': ... (adding prepositions is allowed) | |||
<br/> | |||
<br/> | |||
What could CC4r convey? Is it sufficient to change "mine" to "ours", "me" to "us"? | |||
</div> | |||
[[Category: Prompts]] | [[Category: Prompts]] | ||
Latest revision as of 13:58, 29 April 2024
Séverine Dusollier sent us three prompts after we met for an afternoon to record a conversation (We might turn the conversation into a podcast. You'll find the transcript here). Séverine has been a long time close collaborator and inspiration to us. As a lawyer developing critical approaches to copyright and IP, she brings a particular perspective.
In her first prompt, she proposes to reconsider the relationship between copyright and collective practice asking whether a move from the singular to plural would be sufficient.
"REMINDER TO CURRENT AND FUTURE AUTHORS: The authored work released under the CC4r was never yours to begin with. The CC4r considers authorship to be part of a collective cultural effort and rejects authorship as ownership derived from individual genius. This means to recognize that it is situated in social and historical conditions and that there may be reasons to refrain from release and re-use." (Collective Condition for Reuse)
If copyright can be said to convey the following:
- This work is mine: copyright as ownership, as property right
- This work is me: copyright as personality right
- This work is by me: copyright as a derivation from individual genius, moral right of attribution/paternity
- This work is from me: attribution of a work to me / originality conceived as an author’s own creation
- This work is to me: exclusive rights granted by copyright
- This work ...: ... (adding prepositions is allowed)
What could CC4r convey? Is it sufficient to change "mine" to "ours", "me" to "us"?
